Restorative justice - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Restorative justice is an approach to justice that focuses on the needs of the victims and the offenders, as well as the involved community. This contrasts to more punitive approaches where the main aim is to punish the offender, or satisfy abstract legal principles. Victims take an active role in the process. Meanwhile, offenders are encouraged to take responsibility for their actions, . With crime, restorative justice is about the idea that because crime hurts, justice should heal. It follows that conversations with those who have been hurt and with those who have inflicted the harm must be central to the process. Restorative Justice Community Action, Minneapolis, MN. Our mission: Strengthening communities through. Even more opportunites for interested, involved community members: Sept. Justin Hohne Restorative Action Through Mentoring Program Coordinator/ Agreement Supervisor Justin first joined ARJAA in January of 2012 as a volunteer mentor and was later trained as a volunteer mediator in Restorative Justice and Victim Offender Mediation. UPCOMING FUNDRAISER: YRAP would like to thank # BOYEG for the fundraiser they held in support of our program on August 17th at the Rendezvous Pub (10108 149 Street). Thanks to everyone that came out! See you at the next one. If you want to know how. The Restorative Action Program (RAP) is a community driven initative that deals with bullying and conflict in Saskatoon high schools. For more information about using school-based restorative justice approaches in your school, download this RAP information. In a restorative justice process, the citizens who have been affected by a crime must take an active role in addressing that crime. Although law professionals may have secondary roles in facilitating the restorative justice process, it is the citizens who must take up the majority of the responsibility in healing the pains caused by crime. Carolyn Boyes- Watson (2. Suffolk University's Center for Restorative Justice defines restorative justice as.. These range from international peacemaking tribunals such as the South Africa Truth and Reconciliation Commission to innovations within the criminal and juvenile justice systems, schools, social services and communities. Rather than privileging the law, professionals and the state, restorative resolutions engage those who are harmed, wrongdoers and their affected communities in search of solutions that promote repair, reconciliation and the rebuilding of relationships. Restorative justice seeks to build partnerships to reestablish mutual responsibility for constructive responses to wrongdoing within our communities. Restorative approaches seek a balanced approach to the needs of the victim, wrongdoer and community through processes that preserve the safety and dignity of all. In restorative justice, the questions are: Who has been hurt? What are their needs? Whose obligations are these? What are the causes? Who has a stake in the situation? What is the appropriate process to involve stakeholders in an effort to address causes and put things right? While the former seeks to address only legally relevant issues and to protect both parties' rights, restorative justice aims at . Restorative Action Program Restorative Youth Services Victim Offender Mediation Victim Offender Reconciliation Books Conversation Peace Talking Peace Inviting Dialogue The Little Black Book Educating for Peacebuilding Walking the Talk. History of the RAP Program In 2002, staff, students and administrators at Mount Royal Collegiate in Saskatoon began to address violence, intimidation and bullying that had escalated to the point that it was affecting everyone. Attendance, academic. The authors THE LITTLE BOOK OF oward Zehr directed the first victim offender H conferencing program in the U.S. His book Changing L enses: A New F ocus for Crime and Justice is considered a. William the Conqueror's son, Henry I, detailed offenses against the . By the end of the 1. This gives a good overview of Restorative Justice Community Action's program. It features Founder, Gena Gerard, Judge Richard Hopper, Minneapolis Police Chief Tim Dolan, and many others. Eglash distinguished between three approaches to justice. It offers a different response, namely the use of restorative solutions to repair the harm related to conflict, crime, and victimization. For example, victim- offender mediation is just one model of restorative justice but in the present European context the most important one as described in the works of Christa Pelikan and Thomas Trenczek. Therefore, he says that we have moved forward beyond restorative justice to restorative practice. Meanwhile, offenders can tell their story of why the crime occurred and how it has affected their lives. They are given an opportunity to compensate the victim directly . In serious cases, a sentence may precede other restitution. Offenders listen to victims' experiences, preferably until they are able to empathize with the experience. Then they speak to their own experience: how they decided to commit the offense. A plan is made for prevention of future occurrences, and for the offender to address the damage to the injured parties. Community members hold the offender(s) accountable for adherence to the plan. This can include programs that only serve victims (or offenders for that matter), but that have a restorative framework. Indigenous groups are using the restorative justice process to try to create more community support for victims and offenders, particularly the young people. For example, different programs are underway at Kahnawake, a Mohawk reserve in Canada, and at the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation of the Oglala Lakota nation, within the United States. In prisons. By repairing the harm to the relationships between offenders and victims, and offenders and the community that resulted from the crime, restorative justice seeks to understand and address the circumstances which contributed to the crime. This is thought to prevent recidivism (that is, that the offender repeats the undesirable behavior) once the offender is released. The potential for restorative justice to reduce recidivism is one of the strongest and most promising arguments for its use in prisons. However, there are both theoretical and practical limitations, which can make restorative justice unfeasible in a prison environment. These include: difficulty engaging offenders and victims to participate in mediation; the controversial influence of family, friends, and the community; and the prevalence of mental illness among prisoners. This system generally involves few participants, and often is the only option available to incarcerated offenders. VOM originated in Canada as part of an alternative court sanction in a 1. Kitchener, Ontario case involving two accused vandals who met face- to- face with their many victims. FGC is often the most appropriate system for juvenile cases, due to the important role of the family in a juvenile offender's life. Examples can be found in New South Wales (Australia) under the 1. Young Offenders Act, and in New Zealand under the 1. Children, Young Persons, and their Families Act. The New South Wales scheme has been favorably evaluated by the New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research. Restorative conferencing. Restorative conferences, which have also been called restorative justice conferences, family group conferences and community accountability conferences, originated as a response to juvenile crime. RC is explicitly victim- sensitive. In some cases, a written statement or a surrogate replaces an unwilling victim. The conference facilitator sticks to a simple script. The goal of the conference is for the participants to produce a mutually acceptable agreement that addresses the harm caused by the offender. Augustine of Canterbury (2. Positive results led officials to offer training to all Somerset secondary schools. Judges may sentence offenders to participate; police may refer them before charging them; or they may engage outside the legal system. Victims meet with the board and offender, or submit a written statement which is shared with the offender and the board. Board members discuss the nature and impact of the offense with the offender. The discussion continues until they agree on a deadline and specific actions for the offender to take. Subsequently, the offender documents progress in fulfilling the agreement. After the deadline passes, the board submits a compliance report to the court or police, ending the board's involvement. Restorative circles and restorative systems. The approach involves a much wider circle of participants than conventional victim/offender conferencing, and begins with establishing a restorative system in the neighbourhood or school where circles will be held. As such, Barter's approach offers scope for radical social transformation. This process is being adopted in Germany, the USA, the UK, Canada and Uganda, and outside of the justice and education systems. Meetings specifically address the need for reconciliation with victims of their crime(s). Other prisoners sit in the Circle and help develop the transition plan. This approach has demonstrated the capacity to enhance the safe integration of otherwise high- risk sex offenders with their community. Canada judges some sex offenders too dangerous for any form of conditional release, . A subsequent conviction often leads to designation as a . Between 1. 99. 4 and 2. Co. SA assisted with the integration of well over 1. Research indicated that surrounding a 'core member' with 5. Co. SA projects now exist in every Canadian province and every major urban centre. Co. SA projects are also operational in several U. S. Sentencing circles typically employ a procedure that includes: (1) application by the offender; (2) a healing circle for the victim; (3) a healing circle for the offender; (4) a sentencing circle; and (5) follow- up circles to monitor progress. Implementation. The system was adopted and used in numerous contracted prisons around the country. The system was shown to significantly reduce recidivism and internal conflicts within the prisons. Using restorative justice as an overall BMT is significantly more effective over the long term. It can be difficult to implement, as such wide changes to the culture of an institution are usually met with resistance from both the staff and the institution population. Predominately restorative justice is used for the victim, specifically with a kind of mediation and/or restitution from the offender. Restorative justice is based on bringing together the victim, the offender, and the community; all have equal parts in repairing the relationships destroyed by crime. Generally the offender is held accountable to the victim for the criminal action and accountable as well to the community. The underlying premise of restorative justice holds that all three are accountable to each other. The offender must be held accountable, the offender must give back in the way prescribed by the victim to make amends. Additionally the offender must also give back to the community, as crime devalues any community. The community is accountable to the victim by assisting in enforcing any reparations agreed upon by the victim, and to the offender by helping the person avoid committing any more crime. In some cases, it may be difficult for the victim to participate in meetings directly, but the system is based on the offender being brought to face the implications of the crime. To implement the system within an institution, considerable ground work is needed. First, the institution has to establish what the norms are . Ideally, the institution will define and establish positive norms which each person understands.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2017
Categories |